If you were an emoloyee, then the company should provide. If however you are a sub-contractor then in theory at least, you should provide your own. After all you dont hire a plumber and then lend him your tools to do the job! But of course in the security industry nothing is as it should be when it comes to the medic role. It is a really interesting question and there are many spin off questions that arise out of it, for example; Who should provide the medics with their professional insurances? What would happen if a victim sued someone for malpractice? After all, where does the authority to practice come from? Does it come from the company? If so, does the company have guidelines and procedures such as those in the NHS based on JRCALC? Who in the company provides the authority for practice? Can only really be a doctor! What drugs can be used? If you are an employee then one presumes that the company will provide the items and the authority for their use, however, do they? If a sub-contractor then one presumes that the sub-contractor has in place their own system of clinical governance. There are so many potential pitfalls here for both the medics and the companies it really is a potential minefield. It would be very easy for a victim of an incident find a reason to sue someone.
Just a pause for thought and something to stimulate discussion.