AGF and AQ

DDWhite

Longterm Registered User
Anti-Qaddafi Forces Flew al-Qaeda Flag During Siege of Sirte
October 31, 2011 4:16 P.M.
By John Rosenthal
Sightings of the black al-Qaeda flag flying atop the courthouse of Benghazi only days after the declared “liberation†of Libya on October 23 have raised concerns about the role being played by the Islamic terror organization in post-Qaddafi Libya. For pictorial evidence and eyewitness accounts, see Sherif Elhelwa’s report at Vice here and Raymond Pagnucco’s video on CNN’s user-generated iReport here. But according to a report in the Arab press, the so-called “Islamic Caliphate†flag — the basis of the al-Qaeda flag — was already being flown by anti-Qaddafi forces during the siege of Sirte that would lead to the deposed Libyan leader’s capture and death three days earlier.

According to a translation provided on the “Roads to Iraq†blog, a journalist from the Algerian newspaper Echorouk reported seeing a number of anti-Qaddafi fighters at Sirte “wearing Afghani cloaks and … holding the black banners and flags of ‘There is no God but Allah and Mohammad is his messenger,’ the Islamic Caliphate flag.†A photo accompanying the Echorouk article appears to show a vehicle of the anti-Qaddafi forces flying the black Caliphate flag.



What is commonly known nowadays as the al-Qaeda flag is similar to the Islamic Caliphate flag, but in addition to the Arabic script it also contains a white circle on the black background. It was reportedly first used by the late Abu-Musab al-Zarqawi’s al-Qaeda affiliate in Iraq.

As shown by the captured al-Qaeda personnel records known as the “Sinjar Records,†in per capita terms the eastern Libyan heartland of the anti-Qaddafi rebellion sent more foreign recruits to fight with al-Qaeda in Iraq than any other region in the Middle East or the world. (See here.) One of the military commanders of the rebellion, Abdul Hakim al-Hasadi, has admitted to personally recruiting many of the Libyan al-Qaeda members.

The appearance of the al-Qaeda flag over the Benghazi courthouse has been generally spun by commentators in the Western media as a sign that Islamic extremists are now rushing to fill the “vacuum†left by the fall of the ancien régime in Libya. But the Echorouk report and the accompanying photo indicate that anti-Qaddafi forces in fact fought under the “Islamic Caiphate†banner in the decisive battle of the rebellion.
 
There's an old saying that goes along the lines of "follow the money"i have no doubt that this just as every other armed insurgency is/was funded by a multitude of different sources,AQ will almost certainly have put funds into the coffers ditto Hamas the Iranians reason being it gives leverage politically and religiously, as seen by recent statements on Sharia law by the Transitional Government. As for Afghan fighters well i remember back in the early days of Bosnia, Afghan fighters turning up in quite large numbers for reasons of Jihad and the love of a good scrap,the funding it is said came from Saudi Arabia and a certain Osama Bin Laden.

It is also worth remembering that when we talk about AQ we are talking about a franchise, rather like an evil McDonald's, with branches everywhere. I have no doubt they would fly black Caliphate flag over the town hall of the Islamic republic of Stratford if they thought they would get away with it,not to say they wont come 2012.

As you say, the media will spin this trying to raise the spectre of another Iraq or Afghanistan forgetting that this was an internal overthrow of a dictator by the people of that country, albeit heavily supported by NATO air power.There are not thousands of heavily armed western troops troops camped in the cities and towns, which as the team in Helmand province back in 2006 said.

Quote "If you want an insurgency send a British Brigade to the area" .

I am more inclined to believe that Libya will go the same way as its neighbours Egypt and Tunisia assuming of course they can get the weapons off the streets and the oil companies back.

P
 
Last edited:
Back
Top