AerialDefence
New Member
Hi all,
I'm reaching out to the group with a genuine question around the role (or absence) of Counter-Drone (C-UAS) awareness in the current Close Protection operational landscape. This question is from a number of engagements I've had recently.
As someone who has worked in airspace safety and security at Gov level, I’ve seen a sharp rise in drone-related incidents across a range of sectors — from paparazzi-style intrusions and activist flyovers, to more concerning uses like hostile reconnaissance, harassment, and of course even payload delivery. This is in the UK, not theatre.
I’m therefore genuinely curious — are C-UAS considerations part of your planning and threat assessments?
Or are drones still seen as an edge-case or "someone else’s problem"?
If they’re not being factored in, is it due to:
Thanks in advance,
Steven
I'm reaching out to the group with a genuine question around the role (or absence) of Counter-Drone (C-UAS) awareness in the current Close Protection operational landscape. This question is from a number of engagements I've had recently.
As someone who has worked in airspace safety and security at Gov level, I’ve seen a sharp rise in drone-related incidents across a range of sectors — from paparazzi-style intrusions and activist flyovers, to more concerning uses like hostile reconnaissance, harassment, and of course even payload delivery. This is in the UK, not theatre.
I’m therefore genuinely curious — are C-UAS considerations part of your planning and threat assessments?
Or are drones still seen as an edge-case or "someone else’s problem"?
If they’re not being factored in, is it due to:
- Lack of awareness or perceived relevance?
- Budget or logistical constraints?
- Uncertainty around what a practical response would look like?
- Legal concerns around interdiction or detection?
Thanks in advance,
Steven