Boosting flight security measures

Templar

Longterm Registered User
[URL="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8440409.stm"][url]http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8440409.stm[/URL][/URL]

Boosting flight security measures

Security has been stepped up at many airports in the wake of the alleged bomb plot against a US plane as it approached Detroit on 25 December.
Some countries have announced plans to introduce more sophisticated technology to screen travellers, others are making body and hand-baggage searches more rigorous.
The BBC looks at what changes are being made in a selection of countries.


UNITED STATES
The US Transport Security Administration announced that from 4 January 2010 anyone flying to the US from or through nations considered state sponsors of terror, as well as "other countries of interest", would have to undergo additional security checks before boarding.

The US considers Cuba, Iran, Sudan and Syria to be state sponsors of terrorism, while "countries of interest" include Afghanistan, Algeria, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Nigeria, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Somalia and Yemen.
The new directives - applied irrespective of passengers' nationality - come on top of new "long-term, sustainable" security measures, including pat-downs and bag searches at the gate, which would apply to all US and international airlines at all airports, it said.

During flights, passengers may be asked to follow flight crew instructions, such as stowing personal items, turning off electronic equipment and remaining seated during certain portions of the flight. Such measures will be applied at the "discretion" of the cabin crew.

UNITED KINGDOM
UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown announced on 3 January that he had given the go-ahead for full-body scanners to be introduced at Britain's airports.

BAA, which runs six UK airports, said it would now install the machines "as soon as is practical" at Heathrow, the world's second busiest airport.

Alongside the new scanners, airports are expected to bring in more bomb sniffer dogs and increase their use of passenger profiling. Hand-luggage is also expected to be swabbed for traces of explosive.

In the meantime, extra departure gate checks introduced since Christmas remain in place. These include a pat-down and bag search.

The Department of Transport told the Associated Press that it was still trying to decipher the practical implications of the new US rules.


THE NETHERLANDS
At Amsterdam's Schiphol airport - where Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab transferred onto the flight to Detroit before he allegedly attempted to detonate a bomb - security guards are already using two full-body scanners on passengers flying to the US.

The airport is also trying to quickly fit 13 other scanners with special, less invasive software to allay privacy concerns. Until then, security staff are performing full-body searches on all US-bound passengers.

Schiphol already swabs hand-luggage for traces of explosives, but only luggage belonging to passengers who attract special scrutiny.


FRANCE
After the failed bombing, the French authorities ordered security officers to perform more body searches and extra checks on hand baggage, particularly on those flying to the US.

Checkpoints have been set up at departure gates, where all carry-on items are opened and inspected, and travellers are patted down.


GERMANY
Officials in Germany said no new measures were introduced on 4 January, because airport security had been increased after Christmas Day's failed attack.

The government has yet to decide whether to introduce full-body scanning, with many experts and politicians saying it would invade people's privacy.


ITALY
Security has been tightened at Rome's Fiumicino airport and Milan's Malpensa airport, the country's two busiest, since a suspicious package with a detonator was discovered at the former last week.

Italy's civil aviation authorities had already ordered all airports to be vigilant about flights to the US, and conduct more thorough body and baggage searches.

Interior Minister Roberto Maroni said the government wanted full-body scanners to be installed quickly at Fiumicino and Malpensa and used on passengers of flights considered at high risk of attack. He said Italy wanted to overcome concerns about privacy held by many within the European Union.


SPAIN
Though security has been increased at Spanish airports in the past week, one official told the Associated Press on 4 January that US-bound passengers from countries on the new watch list were not being singled out for body searches.


NORWAY
Passengers in Oslo bound for the US faced heavy security on 4 January. They were forced to show their passports and boarding passes twice at the departure gate, had their carry-on baggage searched, and went through full pat-downs.


CANADA
Transport Canada implemented new security regulations for flights to the US following the 25 December incident. Currently, US-bound passengers are not permitted to take carry-on luggage into the cabin, with the exception of small handags, cameras, coats, medication, laptops and walking-sticks.


AUSTRALIA
The transport ministry said all passengers flying to the US would continue to be patted down and have their carry-on baggage searched. New security measures, including an increase in the number of Australian Federal Police (AFP) officers at the country's 11 major airports, were introduced recently.


SOUTH KOREA
An official at Seoul's Incheon International Airport told the Associated Press that US-bound passengers were now required to go through additional security before boarding, and that more thorough screening had been introduced.


NIGERIA
Nigeria's government has said it will introduce full-body scanners as soon as possible and perform whatever security checks the US authorities request.
The new rules led to long queues at security at Lagos' Murtala Muhammed International Airport on 4 January, where some travellers were reportedly told to check in more than seven hours ahead of their flight to Atlanta.


PAKISTAN
There are no direct flights to the US from Pakistan, but Pakistan International Airlines said it had begun applying the requested security checks on US-bound passengers, including full-body searches.


IRAQ
A spokesman for Baghdad International Airport noted that it already had security procedures in place that were stricter than at any other airport in the world. Passengers have their luggage sniffed by dogs and are patted down before they are allowed to even enter the airport.


SAUDI ARABIA
Extra security personnel have been deployed at the country's airports.


OTHER COUNTRIES ON US WATCHLIST
No changes were seen on 4 January at international airports in Syria, Algeria, Libya or Lebanon, according to the Associated Press.
 
We are always one step behind it seems, always reacting to the latest failed attrocity.
We seem to be learning at a very slow rate.
Our security measures seem to be based around a limited strategy.
And sadly we are as strong as our weakest link.
and looking at the comments above on numerous countries, well we are very weak indeed.
I think the Isreali template, is a good starting point as it has been tried and tested over many seasons, sure the users of Isreali airlines might not be as diverse as say Heathrow and its myriad nationalities, religions and destinations.
But as I said its a great starting point.
A better way than our, over reacted knee jerk responses that we have witnessed so far.
 
All the security measures in the world will become incidental when the bad people start carrying components internally anyway unless passengers are going to be subject to an x-ray before a flight.
 
All the security measures in the world will become incidental when the bad people start carrying components internally anyway unless passengers are going to be subject to an x-ray before a flight.
Adherance to our own rules and regs of who can and can't be allowed to stay in Britain, sharing of information of intelligence and criminal behaviour along with behavioural studies, and good old fashioned intel, will prove even more effective.
Tightening of our border controls, enforcing deportations and detentions will eliminate a lot of the nonsense that is going on and being preached in a mosque near you.
If you are an enemy of the state, be offered the chance to go, or face being incarserated for the peoples safety.
But none the less a very good point scab, is physical detection to be our only defence, it is but a small and vital part of detection,
profiling, FACS, body language, auto response, psych analysis all create a series of hurdles, perimeters that build an in depth picture up of those wishing to do us harm.
I don't care who you are it is next to impossible to be behave normally for any length of time whilst carrying out this type of operation.
If we look for it over a period of time we will detect it, taking pot luck on an alert operator, and decent machinery is not enough in my opinion, and when it comes to mine and my childrens safety,
well you can throw the PC Rule Book out the bloody window.
If your not willing to submit to the prescribed system, well then you don't travel, tough.
 
You can have all the searches, Xrays, cavity searches or whatever, but we then allow people to go airside purchase flammables and various other items to take onto the plane. I'm sure I could knock together a device from my duty free purchases, should I be of that way inclined.
 
Im my modest oppinion I think the First World experts need go to Africa and whatch and learn abaut passagers control before enter in the plane and in some cases when people want enter in the airport .
Hands searches helps alot I think and is not expensive and no problems with Hih Tech software .
Look and touch inside the bags mabe is a not a bad idea .
In this scenarios I strong beleave no rights must exist because when we are 10.000 ft and some thing is rong mabe no second chance in our lives .

Patrol airport corredors whit especial training dogs .
What is the problem ?
Look the Israel Airlines is a very good exemple what is security for all passengers .

Too much Human Rights in this scenario only helps Bad People and demoralizes Security and Law Enforcement Officers .

If we go to event and US president is there US Secret Service make a good search .
why not in the airport ?
 
You can have all the searches, Xrays, cavity searches or whatever, but we then allow people to go airside purchase flammables and various other items to take onto the plane. I'm sure I could knock together a device from my duty free purchases, should I be of that way inclined.


Not only that Rapier but it makes me chuckle everytime I have to go through the security screening process with the liquids and pastes in plastic bags.

It's not a difficult proposition to have a mate who works in Boots or WHSmith in the terminal for them to have a delivery and then for you to purchase said items that had the explosive material in those items.

Do you think they screen all those toileteries in Boots on every delivery? Of course they don't and it wouldn't take much to become an employee and smuggle banned substances via these means.

It does indeed appear that security measures are decided by individuals that are affected by either costs, party politics or both. The technology is out there to detect these materials. The process needs to be defense in depth as all security must be. Passengers walking through screening areas for baggage and bodies must incorporate the full scope of detection capabilities and not just those whereby decisions have been made not to as a result being detrimentally affected by outside influences.

Knee-jerk response springs to mind (again).


Rich H
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Do you think they screen all those toileteries in Boots on every delivery? Of course they don't and it wouldn't take much to become an employee and smuggle banned substances via these means.

Rich H

Rich, Just wanted to quote on the screening of all toiletries that go into boots at the airport, but not only Boots, but everything, and rest assured that I mean everything does get screened, or checked. I know this for a fact.

Regarding other parts of your thread, good points made!
The bad thing about flying, is that we all hate the inconvieniences and hastles, but what we hate even more is the fear of not getting to our destination because some lunatic want´s to blow up the very plane we´re sitting in.
 
Back
Top