Hi there
Alot can be taught on C.P courses and much to the argument that C.P courses should be at least a month etc etc, i feel that if a C.P course is to be around two weeks then other than covering the critirea which should all be as much as possible based upon practical exercises, other subjects or practices should be drilled and covered in those two weeks as much as possible.
some examples i feel which if covered and drilled as much as possible are below.
1) SOPs
2) Route plans and recces
3) Counter surveillance (as indepth as possible, more important than many think!) including Rural and Urban
4) Lima points
5) Vehical debus and embus drills
6) Vehical serach technics
7) I.E.D and V.B.I.E.Ds
8) Log book procedures
9) Radio procedures (including using the "click method")
10) CTRs all aspects.
11) Use of I.R. markers
12) Green O.Ps
13) PERSEC/OPSEC
14) Pistol drills
Ive kept it simple but i would imaging some people never of hearing some of theses things mentioned on their C.P course.
Im not trying to write down or include all topics covered on a C.P course but if anyone reads this and have done their C.P course and never hurd of any of the items above listed then they should be worried about the quality of the C.P course they went on?
And if anyone is looking on going onto a C.P course then they should at least ask the training company if any of the above is covered (and most certanly should be) but more importantly at what standard are the subjects covered and how indepth do they go.
I have spoken to many people in the past who have gone on c.p courses and cheap isnt the way to go! as most of them wouldnt know what your talking about if you mentioned the "click menthod", Lima points or Induction Loops?
Any how its a mind field out there and obviously peoples opinions change but i can confidently say that cheap isnt the way forward and if your not going through SOP after SOP through out your course then certanly if your a civi you wont stand a chance in getting a decent job after you completing your course, people struggle even after completing the very best courses out there let alone cheap and nasty.
Some people would argue that even some of the better known more expensive courses, due to the length of the course dont come up to the neccesary standards which the indusrty needs.
Also something i dont beleive in is the inclusion on C.P Courses are live fire phases????????
Really if you know that little about firearms that you need a few days shooting under your belt to then turn round and convince anyone that your ready to go out to a hostile country, THINK AGAIN!!! it takes a very long time to not just get your shooting down to an art from, theres your safety habits to be drilled into you, let alone all relivant pistol drills, drawing from a holstered position etc etc, all of which you cannot possibly complete on any 2 week or 3 week course.
The only serious C.P course which could cover all what was needed to bring standards up in this country would be a 6 week intensive course, if only......... but only then would we be able to turn round and all be very proud of the badge we all get given at the moment by the SIA.
So at the moment if going on a C.P course choose one on its merrits and take from it what you will but dont think that on its own it will make you a Close Protection Operative which will get you employed and have your right at the top jobs....it wont!
All the very best of luck in your future!
Best regards,
Brengunner.