Five Royal Marines to appear in military court

Ahhh, Team Kelemansa !

Whilst we appreciate your highlighting the possible shortcomings of others for our entertainment....we're still awaiting a response to yours ! Would you care to elucidate ?

You appear to be sharing an IP address with our old dear departed friend, T13, who got himself banned for being a serial pain in the ar5e and provoking other members. An affliction which is clearly contagious, as you appear to be showing the same symptoms.

We had noticed similarities, but gave you the benefit of the doubt, figuring it may be caused by the same Latin temprament, and an addiction to old news stories.

Which is somewhat strange, as he was purportedly based in South America, whilst you dear friend, would appear to represent yourself as closer to His Holiness than his underwear.

We await an explanation with interest.
 
Last edited:
HEY "Kman", Kindly enlighten me, whats the point to this thread. Five Royal Marines facing a day in court for an incident in A-stan. Well here is a news flash, crap happens in combat. Now if you have any influence with the holy father, perhaps there will be divine interventionfor these gallant warriors!
Rant over,Barc out



We sleep safe in our beds because tough men stand ready to visit violence on those who would do us harm
 
Visioneer,

Most articulate in the way you explained the way you discovered the T13 and Keleladymansa connection,

For me a little straighter to the point, I made the connection in literally seconds due to the complete crap that comes out the mans mouth,
 
Was pretty obvious straight away, however as he / it, was using a different ip address, which showed a different location, hard to prove. He / it eventually made the error of loging in using T13 ip address, which kind of gives the game away.

If he doesn't respond in the IMMEDIATE future, I'll ban him just for the hell of it. :)
 
VISIONEER,
If you ban this "Kman" character, this could possibly impact on my quality of life! Please allow me to explain, my predictament here.
I'm a retired guy sitting on my "acreage" located on the harsh plains of Colorado and without cable television to watch soaps, Oprah or the US presidental debates for entertainment. In the near future,I'm going to terminate my paid membership to an internet dating site expire due to the lack of $$$.
However this guy come on this site generally pissing people off with his rants. Needless to say, this guy and a few other muppets are a cheap form of entertainment with their delusions of who their clients are and other nonsense. Seriously,perhaps he needs to be banned, before a sane minded member tracks him down and deals with the situation. rant over, barc-out


Don't mess with old farts....
Age and Treachery will always overcome youth and skill! BS and Brilliance only comes with Age and Experience!
 
Why send troops for war if they can't kill the ennemy?
Medical assistence to the enemy?
Is that my point is not a provocation to nobody is only a refeflection abaut the reasons this soldiers go to a court of law is only that.
But I see in this forum some members get jumpy very fast I don't understand why on this case.
 
Ahhh, Team Kelemansa !

Whilst we appreciate your highlighting the possible shortcomings of others for our entertainment....we're still awaiting a response to yours ! Would you care to elucidate ?

You appear to be sharing an IP address with our old dear departed friend, T13, who got himself banned for being a serial pain in the ar5e and provoking other members. An affliction which is clearly contagious, as you appear to be showing the same symptoms.

We had noticed similarities, but gave you the benefit of the doubt, figuring it may be caused by the same Latin temprament, and an addiction to old news stories.

Which is somewhat strange, as he was purportedly based in South America, whilst you dear friend, would appear to represent yourself as closer to His Holiness than his underwear.

We await an explanation with interest.

Is you need explain why this post is a provocation.
If british law say this mans act in uk name is a murder I serious beleave the provocation is there not at my post.
In one side I understand your reaction is a reaction based in a blind man with no vision at all see enemys shadows in evrywhere even to that want open your eyes for a better vision.
But I must respect your point of vision visioneer.
 
I think what we should do is wait until the Royal Marines have their say. Everyone seems to be all up in arms over this with only one side of the story being heard. Sometimes we can get it all wrong, by looking at a video and listening to something with no way of putting it into context of the moment. I used to be a use of force instructor in my previous life. I have found that it's best to wait for the whole story to come out. If we all sit at four sides of a boxing match (not Fraudley Harrison of course) we will all score the fight in a different way as we will all see different things. There is also an element in my opinion to hear what the guys on the ground had o say. What did they perceive? What brought them to the point of where the video starts? I just think we should hear all the sides of the story before jumping to judgement.

Thinking back there were allegations of Blackwater doing some pretty damaging things in Iraq. Yet they were found not guilty in court as the people had a chance to hear what the guards had to say.

I end it here as I was accused of talking bullshit a few weeks ago.

tapmaster
 
It's a provocation, because as T13, you got a years ban for being an annoying twat, supposedly based in S.America.

You've rejoined shortly after the ban, as Kelemansa, supposedly based in Vatican City, and somewhat closer to The Pope than his personal valet.

One, other, or both, are complete bullsh!t. Care to tell us which ?

There's more than a few members here quite capable of checking any local references you may care to give. Whilst we may expect some members to 'enhance' their experience / profile, sooner or later, it's time to pony up.

So far you're surviving on entertainment value. It's wearing thin :)
 
Dammit barc, it's like having one of those columnists in your favourite daily paper, you just LOVE to argue with. At least they have a few devoted fans. (Try Richard Littlejohn or Jeremy Clarkson in our national press) They at least develop their arguments with degree of humour, whilst they p!ss off 3/4 of the population. And they have the courtesy to let us know EXACTLY who they are.

One, or both of Team Kelemansa's profiles are complete bullsh!t, which brings into doubt ANY point he's trying to make.

Should a local member in either Sao Paulo or Vatican City happen to come across him, please dont inflict any 'permanent' damage. :) (yet)

VISIONEER,
If you ban this "Kman" character, this could possibly impact on my quality of life! Please allow me to explain, my predictament here.
I'm a retired guy sitting on my "acreage" located on the harsh plains of Colorado and without cable television to watch soaps, Oprah or the US presidental debates for entertainment. In the near future,I'm going to terminate my paid membership to an internet dating site expire due to the lack of $$$.
However this guy come on this site generally pissing people off with his rants. Needless to say, this guy and a few other muppets are a cheap form of entertainment with their delusions of who their clients are and other nonsense. Seriously,perhaps he needs to be banned, before a sane minded member tracks him down and deals with the situation. rant over, barc-out


Don't mess with old farts....
Age and Treachery will always overcome youth and skill! BS and Brilliance only comes with Age and Experience!
 
Last edited:
Visioner you are a joker you still want have no vision at all.
I don't care if have members can or can't checking any local references that is not important to me .
Im a Joe Doe a gost no high light professional back ground my speciality is cleaning only that clean the other people mess my boss like call integrated solutions.
I know you like James Bond I understand your stand for that checking fetish.
To let you know with the right program is possible change a IP adress.
What you must focous now is respond to me .
Why this post based on a British newspaper is a provocation in your vision point?
You think is normal this soldiers go to a military court of law for this act?
 
Visioner you are a joker you still want have no vision at all.
I don't care if have members can or can't checking any local references that is not important to me .
Im a Joe Doe a gost no high light professional back ground my speciality is cleaning only that clean the other people mess my boss like call integrated solutions.
I know you like James Bond I understand your stand for that checking fetish.
To let you know with the right program is possible change a IP adress.
What you must focous now is respond to me .
Why this post based on a British newspaper is a provocation in your vision point?
You think is normal this soldiers go to a military court of law for this act?

Your full of shit, the only cleaning you do is a public toilet. In my opinion

I dont know why they are all so judgemental of you as I haven't read your previous comments on other threads, I don't think posting a story as per the original thread is provocation per se, however, if you have a history of provoking a response and/or are clearly doing it to encourage an anti Military/Anti UK stance then rightly so they are judgemental.

Maybe updating your profile with actual information or introducing yourself with a summary of what qualifies your alleged 'professional back ground'. That may, just may foster slightly more trust off members. If your attitude is "I dont care less" I would suggest you bugger off elsewhere to a Jackanory forum.

Regards,

Wingnut
 
v,

can we vote to
a) change the thread title to "5 good lads, innocent until proven guilty get railroaded" or something ?
b) kick someone into cyberspace ?

regards

premier
 
Stuffed regarding change of title. :(

Cyberspace exile imminent. :)

...I'm just fishing to find out EXACTLY what he's gonna claim he is next.
 
Your full of shit, the only cleaning you do is a public toilet. In my opinion

I dont know why they are all so judgemental of you as I haven't read your previous comments on other threads, I don't think posting a story as per the original thread is provocation per se, however, if you have a history of provoking a response and/or are clearly doing it to encourage an anti Military/Anti UK stance then rightly so they are judgemental.


Maybe updating your profile with actual information or introducing yourself with a summary of what qualifies your alleged 'professional back ground'. That may, just may foster slightly more trust off members. If your attitude is "I dont care less" I would suggest you bugger off elsewhere to a Jackanory forum.

Regards,

Wingnut

This post is anti UK?
You can say abaut the news is from a British newspaper.
Better you can say abaut British law makers.
With freinds like this british military staff don't need enemy at all.
But I respect your vision point.
Is true I clean public toilets in fact.
Maybe CNN explain the reason British Military want take this five soldiers to a court of law.
My question this is a normal thing ?

http://edition.cnn.com/2012/10/14/world/europe/uk-royal-marines-murder-case/index.html
 
Last edited:
Cleaning public toilets is probably nearer the truth than either of your T13 or Kelemansa profiles.

I've repeatedly asked you for clarification to no avail.

You've outworn your entertainment value. Again.

Banned.

V
 
Quote from 42 lad:

They violated the ROE and the Geneva convention and worse than that they got caught. I know due to the fact the Reserve Marine who filmed it thought he was a proper green eyed dealer of death and showed all his civvie mates who then grassed him up (good blokes).

Why it was wrong:

1.He was in turbo clip when they found him and should of been cared for as an enemy combatant.
2.He posed no threat as he had been farked up and was laying there in a shit state.
3.Not only is the killing on the video but also the fact that they all stood around him and discussed whether to do it or not.

End quote.

Oh Boy.

In reality, shit happens and the world is a better place without the little bastard but in the eyes of the law which in war zones is a very sensitive subject which basically sets out guidelines of the happy, smiley, preferable way to kill someone(without upsetting them clearly) is just one massive potential cluster ****.

I wish them the very best of luck, I think 2-3 of them will need it sadly.
 
Back
Top