I recently attended a course where I was introduced to the i-gel. It appeared easier, quicker and more effective than an LMA (I have never been fond of LMA's).
I feel the i-gel certainly has a place in pre hospital care and is another valuable airway option. It was interesting to see insertion done whilst ECC where being continuously performed during an arrest scenario.
I agree that ET is still the gold standard in airway management. Also I noted that drug administration was not indicated via the i-gel, unlike ET tubes. I was advised on the course that an ET tube could be blindly inserted through an in situ i-gel. I am yet to fully look into and practice that though.
From an operational stand point where there are often limited operators with EMT training/experience and transport/time critical patients; its a good thing. I think it will add a new skill and capability for EMT B/I in airway management.
NP/OP have a role, but I always attempt to apply best practice if it does not mean compromising the patient and lead to deterioration; ie if the circumstances and time permit secure the airway with an ET.
I have refresher training on the Emergency Airway Management Course at Singapore General Hospital next month. I will take an i-gel and speak to the staff there and see what their opinion is.
In summary, the i-gel is quick, easy to use, and easy to teach……. I rate it.
I'll assume that ECC is CPR over there... I just ran a CODE and was able to drop an ET tube successfully while active compressions were occurring on an 86yr old lady... So.... and not entirely sure bout how the process of dropping an ET tube through an I- gel, but if you insert a King LT airway and it is properly seated, you can pass a bougie tube through it which will exit the ramp and into the trachea, you can then remove the King over the bougie and slide an ET tube down the bougie into the trachea... So it may be possible.
Last edited: