rifleman6388
Longterm Registered User
Okay lets put this another way,the army particularly the tooth arm bits, are by there very nature aggressive,they wouldn't be a lot of use otherwise.A lot of us came from the estates, a lot of us had brushes with law while we grew up,and the army gave a lot of us a second chance unlike it would seem the SIA. Most of the army lads who are still serving or have recently left have spent the last decade in combat, providing if you like "close protection" for this sceptered isle of ours.It has changed all of us who have experienced it,some more than others and not always for the good.The guy who has had a scrap is not the one who would concern me,its the one one who has bottled it up because hes the one who will cause the most damage.
Now let me put a scenario to you, you are in Iraq and you have the choice between a lad who has fought on the ground, knows the ground and knows the social dynamics, but he had a scrap and rather than applying common sense the police cautioned him.The other lad has never been beyond Spanish Rivera,but hes done his 150 hours SIA training, who would you go with.
The SIA would save itself a lot of grief if they used the rehabilitation of offenders act,where a caution is immediately spent.
P
Now let me put a scenario to you, you are in Iraq and you have the choice between a lad who has fought on the ground, knows the ground and knows the social dynamics, but he had a scrap and rather than applying common sense the police cautioned him.The other lad has never been beyond Spanish Rivera,but hes done his 150 hours SIA training, who would you go with.
The SIA would save itself a lot of grief if they used the rehabilitation of offenders act,where a caution is immediately spent.
P
Last edited: