The thing that gets my goat is the AREMT comes into a lot of criticism as it was abused by many however we all get tarred with the same brush. The AREMT system follows the US DOT process, Jones & Bartlett programme, Nancy Caroline text, 250 questions test paper with 80% pass mark, 11 practical exams, ACLS and registration that requires 400 hours of patient contact with skills logs. It also requires annual re-registration, skills log, recorded patient contact, 40 CEUs and renewed ACLS. For some it was a means to an end, like myself. No time to go to uni and no interest in UK ambulance work, no time to go to the states and no interest in US ambulance work, just someone looking to get RPL and a recognisable work title for the uneducated and in total it cost me around £10k to complete.
I understand the UK uni system allows a large amount of placement and i am not bucking the system what i disagree with is the comment that if the course you have completed does not gain HCPC registration post course then it is not a paramedic course.
I am a former CMT1 BATLS BART (14 years with 7 operational tours, countless med covers and placements), Offshore Medic, AREMT-P, ACLS, PHTLS, DAC-EMS (Instructor) with 24 years experience and my practice is very patient care orientated because thats what the job is or at least should be, patient driven. I just get very threaders when i am told i am not a real medic because i don't hold HCPC or NREMT registration,even more threaders and i voice my opinion on it when guys have back doored courses such as AREMT and OSM.
And as a footnote i have not spoken to many guys in the Ambulance service that have recommended it as a positive career path nor back home do i call or refer to myself as a Paramedic.
No matter what system you use you will get the good the bad and the ugly HCPC included but the tarring with the same brush thing is getting a little monotonous.